Main Points
- Sudden or traumatic loss disrupts the internal stability men depend on to function.
- Post-traumatic growth in men refers to the practical changes that occur when a man works with the reality of what happened rather than avoiding it.
- These changes appear in his thinking, his boundaries, and his sense of direction.
- PTG and grief sit side by side — one does not cancel the other.
- Growth becomes visible when a man recognises the weight he carried, understands what was and wasn’t in his control, and begins making deliberate decisions about the man he is becoming.
Post Traumatic Growth in Men: How Sudden Loss Changes Thinking, Identity, and Direction
Sudden loss hits hard. When a death occurs without warning — an accident, suicide, ICU death, or medical shock — a man is thrown into a situation that demands fast action. He often has to make calls, manage information, coordinate decisions, and steady others. All of this happens before he has time to understand what the loss is doing inside him.
The internal system absorbs the event differently. The ground shifts. The structure he relied on changes shape. He keeps functioning because he must, but the cost of that functioning becomes clear only when the immediate urgency settles.
Sudden loss shapes men differently depending on the responsibilities they carry and the expectations placed on them, themes reflected in recent reviews on suicide bereavement in men.
After a sudden loss, a man faces a gap between what happened and how he perceives himself now. Some men start to reflect and transform in this space. Others shut down, withdraw, or remain in ‘survival mode’ for a long time. Post-traumatic growth (PTG) begins only when a man confronts the impact of the loss rather than avoiding it. It is a possible outcome, not an automatic one.
PTG is not emotional improvement. It is a change in clarity. A shift in direction. A recalibration of responsibility, limits, and meaning.
“PTG does not reduce grief. It strengthens the man who lets clarity take shape.”
This article outlines how PTG develops, why men often miss the signs in themselves, and how grief and growth can move together without conflict.
What Post-Traumatic Growth Means for Men
PTG refers to the changes that occur when a man faces the impact of a sudden or traumatic loss and begins to realise what it has revealed about his values, responsibilities, and limits.
Research by Tedeschi and Calhoun identifies five areas where growth can occur: appreciation of life, relationships, personal strength, new possibilities, and meaning. These domains do not replace grief; they develop alongside it. A man may still experience shock, distress, or heaviness, but he begins to think more clearly, allocate his time more intentionally, and view his responsibilities with greater clarity.
Men often experience these five domains in practical ways rather than emotional ones.
Appreciating life can lead to a clearer sense of what matters. Relationship changes often mean selecting dependable people and cutting back on contact with those who cause stress.
Personal strength is demonstrated through the ability to function under pressure and make tough decisions. New opportunities arise when he re-evaluates priorities and shifts his time and energy accordingly.
Meaning develops as he understands the factual circumstances of the loss and recognises what the event has revealed about the kind of man he aspires to be. These changes often occur quietly — through reasoning, structure, and deliberate choices — even while grief remains active.
How PTG Differs From Recovery
Recovery suggests improvement. PTG describes change.
A man can be grieving deeply while still adjusting how he thinks, decides, and engages with the world. PTG does not require emotional ease. It requires a clear understanding of the event and its consequences.
He may feel no relief at all, yet make decisions he would not have made before. This is growth, not comfort.
Sudden Loss and the Initial Impact on Men
Sudden loss puts a man into shock. His thinking narrows, and his body moves into a stress response designed to help him act quickly. Shock can last for days.
During this period, he may function on automatic, make decisions, and respond to what is required, but his ability to register the full impact is limited because his system is focused on stabilising itself.
Responsibilities begin even while he’s in shock — contacting people, speaking with medical staff, managing logistics. He does these tasks because they need doing, not because he’s ready. He might seem composed, but that calmness is often shock, not stability – a response described in Navigating Male Grief.
Once the urgency fades, the internal impact becomes clearer. He notices gaps in memory. He recognises how much he carried. He realises the event reshaped his assumptions about responsibility, safety, and control.
“Shock protects the man in the moment. It delays the cost.”
Why Shock Blocks Early Awareness of Impact
Shock reduces emotional intensity and narrows attention.
This helps a man manage immediate tasks but hides the depth of the disruption. Once shock lifts, the internal system begins to catch up. Many men think they are “getting worse” at this stage, when in reality their clarity is increasing, and the full weight of the event is becoming visible.
This shift is not a regression. It is the moment when the body finally moves beyond shock.
Early Questions Men Hold Internally
Men often carry silent questions that shape their understanding of the event. These questions are not signs of avoidance. They show the system is attempting to make sense of what happened.
Does PTG mean I’m recovering faster than expected?
PTG is not a faster timeline. It is a different process. Growth sits beside grief, not ahead of it.
Does PTG apply if the death was medical, accidental, or unpredictable?
Yes. PTG applies to any event that destabilises a man’s internal framework. The mechanism is the disruption, not the cause.
These questions reflect an internal evaluation — an early stage of meaning-making.
How Post-Traumatic Growth Shows Up in Men
Men seldom recognise PTG in real time. Growth shows up in practical ways long before the man names it; this is consistent with survey data on those bereaved by suicide.
He may become less willing to tolerate unnecessary conflict. He may prioritise relationships that feel dependable and pull back from obligations that drain him. He may choose more carefully how he spends his time and become more protective of the people who matter.
A man experiencing post-traumatic growth often notices he can carry pressure differently. He may not feel stronger, but he behaves with more clarity.
“Growth becomes visible when a man realises his decisions have changed, even if his feelings have not.”
Behavioural Signs of PTG
A man might start reassessing his commitments to reflect his new sense of limits. He could quietly reduce obligations that once felt automatic but are no longer necessary. He may organise his time more deliberately to align with what now matters. These changes indicate a recalibrated internal understanding.
Cognitive Signs of PTG
A man might notice a clearer assessment of what he can realistically manage. He may recognise which responsibilities feel grounded and which seem excessive. He might think more strategically, not from pressure but from accuracy. These cognitive shifts often happen before any emotional changes become noticeable.
Relational Signs of PTG
He becomes more selective about who he keeps close. He gravitates toward people who are consistent, practical, and aligned with his new values. He reduces contact with those who create strain, demand emotional labour, or increase conflict. This is not withdrawal — it is intentional recalibration.
Values-Based Signs of PTG
He has a clearer understanding of what truly matters and what no longer warrants attention. He may prioritise rest, safeguard his time, or approach responsibilities with more intent. His choices reflect a stronger alignment with his core values than with external pressures.
Identity Signs of PTG
He develops a more grounded sense of who he is after the loss. He may see himself as more capable, more responsible, or more aware of his limits. He recognises what the event revealed about the kind of man he wants to be going forward. These shifts are internal and steady, not outwardly expressive.
Physical/Regulation Signs of PTG
His system stabilises over time. He sleeps more consistently, experiences less physical tension, or notices fewer stress-driven surges. These are not emotional breakthroughs — they are signs that his body is beginning to settle as his thinking becomes clearer and his decisions more structured.
Practical/Functional Signs of PTG
He handles responsibilities more accurately. He sets clearer boundaries, completes tasks with greater purpose, and manages pressure more steadily. These changes are often the first signs of growth.
Why Men Often Do Not Recognise Their Own Growth
Men are conditioned to associate progress with emotional relief. When grief stays active, they believe nothing has changed. This is a key reason why they often miss their own PTG. This pattern of misreading their own internal shifts is explored further in The Buried Life of Men
Research on male grief (Doka & Martin; Oliffe et al.) indicates that men often misinterpret their coping mechanisms. They confuse routine with stagnation, private reflection with avoidance, and composure with denial. In reality, these behaviours frequently signal early stages of adaptation.
PTG does not demand emotional expression; it demands awareness. Many men steady themselves by walking, working, or completing tasks because movement and structure help regulate the system enough to think clearly.
Once the immediate shock subsides and he begins reflecting on what happened, assumptions and distortions often emerge. He might believe he should have foreseen the outcome or prevented what occurred.
This is where guilt takes root. When a man assumes responsibility for events beyond his control, growth can feel disloyal — as if stabilising means abandoning the person who died.
“Self-judgment grows from expectations no one could have met.”
Research in critical care and suicide prevention shows that rapid deterioration, risk escalation, and medical collapse cannot be predicted reliably — even by specialists. When a man begins replacing assumptions with accurate information, guilt reduces, and PTG becomes easier to recognise.
Reflection
What has shifted in the way you think, decide, or manage your responsibilities since the loss occurred? These shifts may feel subtle, but they are often the first signs of growth.
Micro-Exercise
Take ten minutes and write one sentence that describes a decision you would not have made before the loss.
Do not justify it. Do not explain it. Simply name the decision. This helps identify the earliest signs of post-traumatic growth in men.
Barriers That Restrict Post-Traumatic Growth
Even when a man seems functional, several internal pressures can limit post-traumatic growth in men. These pressures are not signs of weakness. They are predictable and often unseen responses to sudden loss. Men rarely talk about them, but they influence how growth occurs.
The Burden of Misplaced Responsibility
Men often link responsibility with preventing issues. After a sudden death—such as suicide, accidents, medical collapse, or ICU deterioration—many believe they should have noticed something earlier or taken different action. This idea quickly takes hold because men are conditioned to be accountable for outcomes. Once adopted, guilt becomes rigid and hinders growth.
Misplaced responsibility is potent because it creates a conflict between truth and expectation. The expectation says, “I should have prevented this.” The truth says, “The conditions made prevention impossible.”
Until these two are separated, PTG remains limited. A man cannot grow while holding himself accountable for something he could not have controlled.
“Guilt convinces a man he failed, even when the situation was impossible to change.”
Functioning vs Avoidance — Understanding the Difference
Men often confuse functioning with avoidance. When they continue working, managing responsibilities, or completing tasks, they believe they are ignoring the loss. In reality, functioning might be the only stabilising factor available in the early stages of shock.
Avoidance is the refusal to acknowledge the event.
Functioning involves taking action while still processing the event internally.
Many men think clearly while walking, driving, or doing hands-on tasks because structure helps regulate the nervous system.
These patterns are not types of avoidance; they are adaptations that help the mind engage without getting overwhelmed.
The Silence That Follows Sudden Loss
Support often diminishes quickly after the first few days or weeks. People assume a man is coping because he looks calm or functional. This creates a gap between external perceptions and his internal reality.
He continues managing shock, intrusive thoughts, and the responsibilities that come with death, but with less recognition from others.
This silence isn’t a sign of disinterest; it shows a lack of understanding. Others go back to their routines. The man doesn’t.
Without consistent acknowledgment, he bears the full cognitive and emotional burden alone. He misses opportunities to check his interpretations, test his assumptions, or articulate parts of his experience aloud. This isolation hampers growth because growth depends on accurate reflection.
Why Men Lose Support Too Early
Most men do not withdraw because they want distance; they do so because support diminishes before they have stabilised. People assume that if he is calm, he is coping, and if he is functioning, he is fine. These assumptions seem practical but create pressure for the man, who still feels disoriented inside.
I spent a month in the ICU with my son before he died. The alarms, the clinical decisions, the way information changed from hour to hour — these experiences live in the body long after the moment itself. ICU does not just create emotional memories; it creates sensory and cognitive imprints that are hard to explain unless you have sat in that room. This is why men often carry ICU experiences in ways they cannot immediately name.
“Isolation does not come from choice. It comes from assumptions.”
The Pathway Forward — How Men Begin Rebuilding
Sudden loss forces a man to act before he has a chance to understand what has happened to him. He may be supporting others, working, or completing tasks, yet beneath the surface, he feels a sense of disorientation.
This disorientation is the natural outcome of a sudden disruption to his sense of order, identity, and safety.
Rebuilding begins when a man recognises that the loss has changed him. He understands that returning to who he was before the event is not possible. This is not defeat or resignation. It is the first accurate step toward post-traumatic growth in men.
Growth begins when a man responds to what is real rather than trying to force himself back into a version of life that no longer fits.
“Growth starts when a man stops asking how to get back to who he was and begins asking who he is now.”
Engagement — The First Step Toward Stability
Engagement is the point where a man moves from reacting to choosing. It is not an emotional expression. It is not verbal disclosure. Engagement is the willingness to stop avoiding the reality of the event and acknowledge its impact — even if only internally.
A man engages by revisiting the sequence of events, assessing what was within his control, and recognising what changed inside him. This process often occurs while walking, driving, or completing tasks because movement provides his mind with enough structure to handle difficult thoughts.
Engagement stabilises thinking and reduces internal chaos. It creates the initial space where meaning-making can occur. This is often the earliest sign of post-traumatic growth in men.
How Men Engage Without Emotional Disclosure
Many men reflect quietly rather than verbally. They engage the loss when they think directly about what happened — even if silently.
A man can replay the order of events, test his assumptions, determine which beliefs are significant, and evaluate which responsibilities seem correct. None of this requires emotional expression.
Avoidance is the refusal to think. Engagement is internal honesty. This difference matters because PTG develops only when the man begins working with the event rather than pushing it away.
Connection — Support That Helps Without Pressure
Men rarely require large networks. They need consistent contact with a small group of dependable, practical, and steady individuals. This kind of support helps manage the internal pressure that comes with sudden loss. It reduces feelings of isolation. It keeps stability intact even when emotions are unpredictable or hard to identify.
Connection allows the man to remain in contact with others while still maintaining control over what he shares. This stability makes engagement easier, which in turn strengthens post-traumatic growth in men.
“Men grow when connection is grounded, predictable, and free from emotional demands.”
What Support Men Actually Use
Men often access support in quiet, practical ways. They share while walking, working, or driving because these environments regulate intensity. They prefer conversations that do not press for detail or emotion. They value presence over commentary because it allows them to think without performing.
This type of support is effective because it offers structure without pressure. The man remains anchored while still having space to process the event internally.
Strategic Self-Disclosure — Releasing Pressure Safely
Strategic disclosure is a controlled form of expression. It is the deliberate choice to share a small part of the experience — one sentence, one question, one observation — when it feels appropriate. This type of sharing reduces internal strain because the entire event is no longer held privately.
A man does not need to tell the whole story. He does not need to speak with intensity or detail. He only needs to let out enough to reduce the cognitive load. Strategic disclosure helps organise the experience, which strengthens clarity.
Why Brief, Controlled Sharing Works
Brief disclosure helps the man form a more precise sequence of events. It allows him to check assumptions, correct internal distortions, and release pressure. It reduces the intensity of mental replay because the mind does not have to hold everything at once.
This is not emotional unloading. It is a structured reflection.
It is one of the core drivers of post-traumatic growth in men because clarity becomes easier when the mind is not carrying the entire weight alone.
Reflection
What is one part of the experience you think about most often? How has that thought changed over time? Noticing the shifts in your thinking can reveal where growth has already begun.
Micro-Exercise
Take a moment and identify one sentence you could share with someone you trust — not the whole story, just one line. Write it down. If speaking it aloud feels too much, hold the sentence and notice how the pressure shifts when the words exist outside your mind.
Meaning-Making — The Core of Post-Traumatic Growth
Meaning-making is the process by which a person starts to understand the facts, the impact, and the consequences of the loss.
It’s not abstract philosophy, nor is it emotional catharsis. It’s a deliberate attempt to clarify what happened and why it affected him the way it did.
For some men, this is a practical assessment; for others, it may also involve spiritual or existential questions about responsibility, purpose, or who they want to be now.
A man begins making meaning when he starts asking questions that help him organise the event. He assesses what was within his control and what was not. He reflects on how his thinking has evolved. He notices where he’s carrying weight that doesn’t belong to him. This is not intellectual escape; it is the basis of post-traumatic growth in men.
“Meaning-making replaces confusion with accuracy. Accuracy reduces guilt. Reduced guilt makes growth possible.”
Questions That Build Clarity
Meaning-making often starts with a set of direct questions:
- What actually happened, and in what order?
Reconstructing the timeline helps separate assumptions from facts. It also allows the man to see the pressures he faced and the limits of what anyone could have done in that moment. - What was in my control and what wasn’t?
This question interrupts self-blame. A man often discovers that the conditions leading to the loss were far more complex, unpredictable, or rapid than he initially realised. - How has this changed the way I think or act?
These observations show early signs of PTG — often before the man recognises them as growth.
These questions strip away distortion. They allow the man to work with truth instead of the emotional noise created by shock, guilt, or external pressure.
For men who need a structured way to organise these questions and reduce internal overload, the Reset Compass provides a step-by-step process for stabilising thinking and rebuilding direction. THE RESET COMPASS™ – Mentoring Through The Maze
How Meaning-Making Reduces Guilt
Guilt is often the most significant barrier to PTG.
When a man believes he should have prevented the death, growth feels disloyal. Meaning-making challenges this belief by examining the circumstances accurately. ICU deterioration, medical unpredictability, suicide risk escalation, and sudden accidents often occur in conditions that even specialists cannot foresee or stop.
Once the man recognises the actual conditions — rapid deterioration, missing information, shifting clinical realities, or the absence of warning signs — he begins to understand that prevention was not possible.
Guilt loosens. Clarity rises. Growth becomes available in a way it was not before.
“Accuracy dismantles guilt. Only then can a man see who he is becoming.”
Identity Reconstruction After Sudden Loss
Sudden loss alters how a man sees himself. Identity reconstruction is not reinvention. It is the gradual alignment of his life with what the loss has made clear. This reconstruction develops through his decisions, boundaries, and sense of responsibility.
He may notice that he no longer accepts the same pressures he once tolerated. He may become more deliberate with commitments. He may redefine what strength means — not as endurance at any cost, but as clarity about what can reasonably be carried.
These shifts often emerge before the man consciously acknowledges them. Identity reconstruction is one of the deepest layers of post-traumatic growth in men because it reshapes the internal framework from which he operates.
What Identity Reconstruction Looks Like
Identity reconstruction often appears in three areas:
- Self-understanding
A man develops a clearer picture of who he is, what matters to him, and what he can and cannot carry. This is not a philosophical idea; it is grounded in the practical realities of what he lived through. - Boundaries and responsibility
He becomes more discerning about the commitments he takes on and more honest about his limits. This is not a withdrawal. It is accuracy about capacity. - Direction and purpose
He notices that his long-term plans shift. He may value time differently. He may prioritise relationships that feel genuine and reduce those that drain him.
These changes are not symbolic. They are practical outcomes of the loss and the meaning he has made from it.
What PTG Means for Long-Term Direction
PTG becomes practical when a man applies his new understanding to long-term choices. Growth does not stay just an idea; it appears in how he manages his life.
Sudden or traumatic loss often causes a man to reassess how he spends his time, who he invests in, the responsibilities he takes on, and how he approaches the next stage of his life.
He may become more protective of his time because he understands its fragility. He may become more selective with relationships because he recognises their impact on his internal stability. He may organise his responsibilities more clearly because he knows what he can carry without collapsing under the weight.
These changes do not erase grief. They demonstrate integration. The man is not the same person he was before the loss — and he is starting to live from that truth.
How Men Experience Long-Term PTG Without Using Emotional Language
Most men do not describe themselves as “growing” or “healing.”
Instead, they say things like:
- “I don’t put up with the same pressures anymore.”
This reflects a shift in boundaries — a grounded recognition of what now feels excessive or misaligned. - “I’m clearer about what matters.”
This reflects recalibrated values, often shaped by the experience of loss. - “I think differently about responsibility now.”
This reflects a corrected understanding of what was and wasn’t within their control.
These statements show long-term PTG. They demonstrate that the event has been integrated into the man’s identity without defining him entirely.
What the Research Shows About PTG in Men
PTG is often described in terms of categories such as appreciation, personal strength, relationship depth, new possibilities, and meaning-making (Tedeschi & Calhoun). For men, these categories remain relevant, but they often appear through quieter, more cognitive pathways.
Research shows several consistent patterns:
- Men often report PTG less frequently than women.
This is not because men experience less growth, but because they do not use the same language to describe internal change. This pattern is confirmed in a meta-analysis of gender differences in post-traumatic growth. - Men tend to process through reasoning and responsibility rather than emotional expression.
Research on male grief (Doka & Martin; Martin & Doka; Oliffe et al.) consistently highlights these cognitive pathways. Men stabilise by thinking clearly, not by disclosing intensely. - Guilt and role expectations strongly shape male responses to sudden loss.
Men frequently assume responsibility for outcomes no one could have controlled. This internal expectation restricts growth until it is corrected. - Steady connection increases PTG outcomes.
Studies by Levi-Belz and others show that reliable, low-pressure support significantly improves men’s ability to integrate loss. Men benefit from relationships that offer presence rather than emotional demand.
“Men grow through clarity, not performance.”
These patterns demonstrate why post-traumatic growth in men often develops quietly and why it is frequently overlooked — even by the men experiencing it.
Reflection
What part of your identity feels different since the loss? Not the emotions — the decisions, the boundaries, the way you carry yourself. These shifts often reveal where meaning-making and identity reconstruction have already begun.
Micro-Exercise
Write one sentence describing something you no longer tolerate or accept in your life since the loss. This is not defiance. It is direction. It shows where your identity has already shifted.
How Mentoring Helps Men Access Post-Traumatic Growth
Mentoring provides men with a safe space to reflect without feeling pressured. Many men cope with sudden loss through structure, clarity, and thoughtful reasoning — not emotional displays.
A grounded mentoring space enables him to organise the event, properly assess responsibility, and address internal distortions that hinder post-traumatic growth in men.
A mentor does not demand disclosure or emotional intensity. The value lies in steady conversation, practical reflection, and careful questions that help the man stabilise his thinking. This approach reinforces the cognitive pathways men naturally use when integrating sudden or traumatic loss.
Guides like the Reset Compass support this process by giving men a framework they can work through between conversations, keeping the momentum of clarity and stability moving forward.
When a man has space to reflect without judgment or expectation, clarity emerges. When clarity emerges, guilt diminishes. When guilt diminishes, growth becomes clear.
“Men do not need fixing. They need clarity, structure, and a place to think honestly.”
Mentoring enhances identity reconstruction by helping a man determine what now matters, what no longer fits, and where his internal system is already shifting. It enables him to incorporate change without abandoning the person he has lost or suppressing the grief that remains.
Reflection
Who helps you think clearly without pushing you to explain more than you want to? How do those conversations shift your understanding of the event and of yourself?
Micro-Exercise
Write one question you would want to explore with someone who understands the weight of sudden loss. Keep the question simple. The goal is not to answer it immediately — it is to notice what your mind is already trying to understand.
KEY TAKEAWAYS — Post Traumatic Growth in Men After Sudden or Traumatic Loss
- PTG does not reduce grief — it changes a man’s clarity and direction.
A man may still feel the full weight of the loss while making decisions that reflect stronger boundaries, clearer purpose, and a sharper sense of responsibility. Growth sits beside grief, not behind it.
- Sudden loss disrupts a man’s internal framework more than his external functioning.
Many men appear composed because they are in shock. When shock lifts, the internal impact becomes clearer. This is not deterioration — it is the system finally catching up.
- Engagement is the turning point in post-traumatic growth in men.
Engagement means thinking directly about the event, even privately. It is not emotional disclosure. It is internal honesty, and it marks the shift from reacting to choosing.
- Connection matters, but without emotional demand.
Men grow through reliable, grounded support — people who offer presence without forcing conversation or performance. Predictable connection stabilises the system and reduces isolation.
- Strategic self-disclosure reduces cognitive load.
Sharing one sentence at a time — at the right moment — helps organise the event and reduces internal pressure. This allows meaning-making to take shape.
- Meaning-making is the core mechanism of PTG.
Men grow when they replace assumptions with accuracy. Guilt reduces when the man understands what happened factually and recognises what was outside his control.
- Identity reconstruction develops quietly and steadily.
A man becomes more deliberate, more selective, and more aligned with what matters. PTG is behavioural and cognitive — not emotional performance.
- Mentoring strengthens stability and direction.
A grounded mentor helps a man think clearly, reduce internal chaos, and recognise the growth already underway.
Recommended Reading
- Anger in Men’s Grief: Causes Patterns and Practical Steps
- Male Grief in Australia: Understanding How Men Grieve and Rebuild
- Mentoring for Men: Rebuilding Strength Soul and Direction after Loss
- Grief Support for the Quiet Man: How Silence Can Be a Way to Heal
FAQs — Post-Traumatic Growth in Men
Does PTG mean I am recovering faster than expected?
No. PTG is not a speed or a stage. It describes internal changes in thinking, boundaries, and direction that appear alongside grief. Growth does not mean the grief is smaller — it means the clarity is stronger.
Can PTG happen after non-suicide losses such as ICU deterioration or accidents?
Yes. PTG applies to any sudden or destabilising event. The mechanism is the disruption to a man’s internal framework, not the specific cause of death.
Why do I feel worse now than I did in the first days?
Early functioning often reflects shock. When shock recedes, clarity increases. This shift can feel like deterioration, but it usually reflects the nervous system beginning to register the event.
Why do I feel responsible even when others tell me I’m not?
Men often equate responsibility with prevention. Meaning-making helps separate what was possible from what was never in his control. This separation reduces self-judgment.
What if I think differently but don’t feel emotional?
Many men experience PTG through reasoning, decision-making, and sharper boundaries. PTG does not require emotional expression. Practical change often appears before emotional change.
What if I still feel anger, confusion, or guilt?
These reactions can sit beside growth. PTG does not require emotional resolution. It requires accuracy about what happened and how it affected the man.
How do I know when I need professional support?
If functioning drops, distress escalates, or thinking becomes disorganised, structured support provides stability. This is not failure — it is maintenance of cognitive integrity during a destabilising period.
Does PTG require talking openly?
No. Men often process internally. Disclosure can be minimal, selective, or task-based. The key is engagement with the reality of the event, not the volume of expression.
Can PTG occur while life still feels disrupted?
Yes. Growth often appears in small, practical shifts long before life feels settled. Long-term direction takes shape as clarity increases and guilt decreases.
About the Author
David Kernohan is a men’s mentor based in Perth, Western Australia, and the founder of Mentoring Through the Maze™. He supports men who carry the weight of sudden loss, identity disruption, responsibility overload, and internal disconnection. With more than three decades of experience across mental health, crisis response, and community leadership, he works with men who prefer grounded, practical conversations rather than emotional intensity or clinical detachment. His approach is built on clarity, structure, and the belief that men do not need fixing — they need a place to think honestly and rebuild direction with confidence.
References
Calhoun, L. G., & Tedeschi, R. G. (2006). Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Creegan, M., Spillane, A., Kennedy, M., Dorman, S., O’Shea, M., Brady, B., … & Arensman, E. (2024). Exploring posttraumatic growth in individuals bereaved by suicide: A secondary data analysis of a national survey. Death Studies, 48(7), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2376823
Doka, K. J., & Martin, T. L. (2010). Grieving beyond gender: Understanding the ways men and women mourn (revised edition). Routledge.
Drapeau, C. W., Lockman, J. D., Moore, M. M., & Cerel, J. (2019). Predictors of posttraumatic growth in adults bereaved by suicide. Crisis, 40(3), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000556
Ferlatte, O., et al. (2024). Impacts of suicide bereavement on men: A systematic review. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1372974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1372974
Jordan, J. R. (2020). Lessons learned: Forty years of clinical work with suicide loss survivors. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 766. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00766
Levi-Belz, Y. (2019). With a little help from my friends: A follow-up study on the contribution of interpersonal characteristics to posttraumatic growth among suicide-loss survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 11(1), 122–130.
Levi-Belz, Y. (2023). To turn a personal tragedy into triumph: Coping and growth in the aftermath of suicide loss. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. https://afsp.org/story/to-turn-a-personal-tragedy-into-triumph
Levi-Belz, Y., Krysinska, K., & Andriessen, K. (2021). “Turning personal tragedy into triumph”: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on posttraumatic growth among suicide-loss survivors. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(3), 322–332.
Martin, T. L., & Doka, K. J. (2000). Men don’t cry…women do: Transcending gender stereotypes of grief. Brunner/Mazel.
Moore, M., Palmer, J. K., Cerel, J., & Ruocco, K. (2022). Growth and hope after loss: How TAPS facilitates posttraumatic growth in those grieving military deaths. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 996041. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.996041
Oliffe, J. L., Rossnagel, E., Bottorff, J. L., Chambers, S. K., Caperchione, C., & Rice, S. M. (2016). After the death of a friend: Young men’s grief and masculine identities. Social Science & Medicine, 153, 1–9.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (1996). The Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Measuring the positive legacy of trauma. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 9(3), 455–471.
Tedeschi, R. G., & Calhoun, L. G. (2004). Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychological Inquiry, 15(1), 1–18.
Vishnevsky, T., Cann, A., Calhoun, L. G., Tedeschi, R. G., & Demakis, G. J. (2010). Gender differences in self-reported posttraumatic growth: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(1), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01546.x
Whittaker, S., Rasmussen, S., Cogan, N., Tse, D., Martin, B., Andriessen, K., … & Krysinska, K. (2025). Posttraumatic growth among suicide-loss survivors: Protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. JMIR Research Protocols, 14, e64615.
2 Responses